Is property on the nose for SMEs?
Published 26-MAR-2019 16:35 P.M.
5 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
Here's an interesting property story.
It has to do with SMEs, property, the government and Scottish Pacific.
This is the pretext: “Small businesses find it difficult to obtain finance other than on a secured basis, typically against real estate. Even when small businesses can access finance, funding costs are higher than they need to be,” Federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said.
In a nutshell, there's a problem for SMEs when it comes to finance.
And some of those problems are directly related to property according to the SME Growth Index research conducted independently by banking analysts East & Partners, on behalf of national working capital funder and recently delisted Scottish Pacific.
The survey recorded the views of owners, CEOs and senior financial staff of 1257 SMEs across all states and key industries, with annual revenues of $A1-20 million.
SMEs willing to pay more to avoid property security
Of the 91% of business owners who said they were willing to pay a higher rate for finance if they could avoid using property as security, almost two-thirds (65%) indicated they ‘definitely’ would be willing, and more than a quarter (26%) said ‘probably’, according to Scottish Pacific CEO Peter Langham.
“The number of SMEs who would ‘definitely’ be prepared to pay more to avoid providing real estate security has more than doubled in the past few years, rising from 29.5% to 65%,” Mr Langham said.
Only 2.5% of business owners would prefer to provide real estate security rather than pay a higher rate over the life of their business loan.
Almost half SMEs say property market is hurting their access to finance
This strong sentiment to remove property from the business funding equation comes in light of the sharp correction in residential property prices affecting capital cities, Sydney and Melbourne in particular.
Current property market conditions, highlighted by stalling building and loan approvals, are clearly having an impact on small and medium business owners.
Mr Langham said almost half the SMEs surveyed (44.5%) say property market conditions are already making it harder for them to access business funding, likely due to the softening of house prices in major markets.
A further 35% haven’t felt the impact but say they are expecting the housing price correction and broader property market conditions will have a significant impact on their borrowing capacity in the near future.
“When we last assessed the impact of the property market in September 2017, three out of four SMEs said property prices were having no direct impact on their businesses. In the March 2019 SME Growth Index research, only one in five SMEs said they had not seen a direct impact,” Mr Langham said.
He said property prices are having more impact on SMEs in Victoria and NSW (affecting 48% and 46% of SMEs respectively), with Queensland small businesses (39% affected) the most buffered.
Declining or no-change SMEs are currently being hit harder by property market movements, with 54% of non-growth SMEs already impacted (compared to 36% of growth SMEs).
“For these non-growth SMEs, finances are already stretched thin and now with the property market impact kicking in they are feeling ‘when it rains, it pours’. These are the businesses that currently need the most support to get through tough market conditions,” Mr Langham said.
Property security is in top 2 SME funding frustrations
The message around property-secured lending is loud and clear: eight out of 10 business owners say they resent providing property as a security against new loans or as part of loan serviceability assessments. This was the second biggest frustration, behind only loan conditions.
Alongside this finding, for the first time SMEs are about as likely to turn to an alternative lender as they are to ask their main bank to fund growth.
“The environment that has developed as a result of the Banking Royal Commission means banks are making more stringent credit checks. SMEs looking to fund growth will have to factor in potential roadblocks around finance availability and using property as security,” Mr Langham said.
“One of the key benefits small business owners find in many of the alternative lenders, including Scottish Pacific, is they don’t have to provide their family home as security. This unshackles the family home from business growth and frees it to be used in other ways to secure their personal financial futures.
“However, with Productivity Commission data showing 35-50% of Australian SMEs rely on property security to fund their businesses*, we believe that too many business owners remain unaware they can use balance sheet assets as security instead of property - assets including equipment, and invoices issued.”
While property prices and market conditions (including the worst annual drop in home loan numbers since the GFC) are cyclical, Australia’s long-term downtrend in the rate of home ownership should be noted.
“A not-too-distant future where there may be more entrepreneurs renting than buying means that increasingly business owners will have to consider business borrowing secured against assets other than property,” Mr Langham said.
“More stringent lending conditions, along with a cooling property market, will impact on SME owners who need to use their home as security against business borrowing. For any SME owner who feels compelled to rely on providing property as security for their business loans, the credit squeeze may well be on.”
* The Productivity Commission reports that around a third of all small business lending by the major banks is secured by real estate. Outside of the majors, the share of small business lending secured by residential property is higher, with almost 47% of small business loans by value secured by residential property.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.