Could cannabis be key to combat the opioid crisis?
Published 23-NOV-2018 16:21 P.M.
6 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
Weed’s legal forays began in the medical space as a way to treat chronic pain and anxiety, among other conditions.
Today, with the drug showing positive effects on an ever-expanding litany of ailments from epilepsy to cancer, there’s also growing research showing that there are specific constituents in cannabis which may have a profound impact on controlling the addictive effects of opioids, and possibly serving as a treatment for opioid dependence and withdrawal.
Steven Laviolette, Western University professor in neuroscience, writes in a recent op-ed in The Conversation that the interactions between opioids and cannabis have been explored on clinical and pharmacological levels for decades. However, marijuana’s potential to modulate the addictive effects of a much harder opioid class drug such as heroin or fentanyl, or to potentially reduce opioid cravings, is only just beginning to be explored.
Similarly, Dr. Jeffrey Chen, director of the Cannabis Research Initiative at the University of California, Los Angeles, notes that “the public consumption of cannabis has already far outpaced our scientific understanding. We really desperately need to catch up.”
There are encouraging signs. In a landmark 2014 study, a team of researchers analysed data from across the US over a 10-year period. They found that states with legalised medical cannabis saw 25% fewer opioid-related deaths than states where it remained illegal.
These findings made way for others to investigate associations between US medical cannabis laws and reduced state-level estimates of opioid prescriptions, misuse and dependence, as well as opioid-related hospitalisations and non-fatal overdoses.
Opioid overdose trends have also changed following recreational cannabis legalisation in some US states, Laviolette says. For example, a recent study found that opioid-related deaths in Colorado were (modestly) reduced relative to two comparison states in the short term following recreational pot legalisation.
University of British Columbia academics, M-J Milloy and Stephanie Lake, point to the situation in Canada, where recreational pot was legalised in October, suggesting that this could be a salient opportunity to use the drug to tackle the country’s opioid crisis.
“Fuelled by the contamination of the illicit drug supply with fentanyl and its analogues, the opioid epidemic is Canada’s gravest public health crisis since the emergence of HIV in the 1980s,” they write. “Experts agree on the need for creative responses based on scientific evidence.”
Correspondingly, scientists from the purviews of public health, medicine and economics are “aiming to figure out if cannabis legalisation could be part of the solution”.
Globally, prescription opioid pain relievers are among the most commonly misused and abused medicines. In North America, Australia and New Zealand, their illicit usage outpaces that of heroin, which produces a similar high. Like heroin, moreover, recreational use of these kinds of products can pose serious health risks, including death.
According to the World Health Organisation, there were an estimated 27 million people who experienced opioid use disorders in 2016.
In the 1990s, pharmaceutical companies began to develop slow-release formulations of opioids (OxyContin, for example) and marketed them as safe and effective medications for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain.
While opioids are now known to carry a high risk of dependence and overdose, more than 20 million opioid prescriptions are still filled each year in Canada alone.
Overdose deaths contribute to between roughly a third and a half of all drug-related deaths, which are attributable in most cases to opioids.
There are effective treatments for opioid dependence, yet less than 10% of people who need such treatment are receiving it.
Canada is the world's second-largest per capita consumer of opioids. Almost one in five Canadians live with some form of chronic pain.
Drug overdoses are now the leading cause of death among Americans under the age of 50, and prescription opioids are involved in nearly half of these deaths, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
With those numbers in mind, a study by Milloy, Lake and others published in September showed that highly marginalised patients on “opioid agonist therapy,” with the drugs methadone or suboxone, were more likely remain on their treatment six months later if they were using cannabis on a daily basis.
Lavoilette highlights the well-understood pharmacology and psychotropic profiles of both THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) and CBD (cannabidiol). For instance, THC is considered to be the main psychoactive chemical in marijuana, responsible for its intoxicating effects and rewarding and dependence-producing properties. In contrast, CBD has been shown to counteract the psychoactive side-effects of THC.
Laviolette explains that research with rats has shown that adolescent exposure to THC can lead to a long-term hyperactive state of the brain’s dopamine pathways. These are critical to many psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia and are also partially responsible for the rewarding and addictive properties of opioids.
Other pre-clinical research has shown that adolescent exposure to THC can increase sensitivity to the addictive properties of heroin in later life.
Interestingly, CBD has the exact opposite effect on dopamine. For example, Laviolette says, “we have shown that CBD can block the sensitisation of the brain’s dopamine system in response to drugs like amphetamine.”
“Even in the adult brain, we were able to demonstrate that whereas THC acutely activates dopamine, similar to drugs like morphine and heroin, CBD decreases dopamine activity.”
“The story becomes even more interesting when we consider the effects of cannabinoid signals in specific brain circuits,” he adds.
“Drugs like THC, which can activate the brain’s cannabinoid receptors, might actually reduce the addictive potential of opioid-class drugs — especially in certain addiction-related brain circuits — by regulating how the rewarding and addictive properties of opioids are processed.”
In contrast, CBD has been shown to strongly inhibit the brain’s dopamine pathways and may possess anti-addiction potential.
According to Lavoilette, there is already promising data from human clinical studies suggesting that CBD could indeed act as a promising treatment for opioid-related addictive behaviours, although he cautions that we need to improve our understanding of precisely how THC and CBD are producing their effects.
In a paper published in Trends in Neurosciences earlier this year, neuroscientist Yasmin Hurd – whose own research suggests that CBD reduces heroin cravings and restores neurobiological damage – blames the reluctance to acknowledge CBD’s effectiveness on the scientific community’s exclusions from policy-making discourse.
Like Chen, Hurd argues that “legalisation has outpaced the science”. She calls for a structure to “fast track” clinical CBD – and, importantly, to make trials looking at this particular cannabinoid a priority.
“As the legal landscape for medical marijuana unfolds,” Hurd writes, “it is important to distinguish it from ‘medical CBD’ and other specific cannabinoids, that can more appropriately be used to maximise the medicinal potential of the marijuana plant.”
Hurd suggests that until the scientific and medical communities are permitted to take a more leading role, safe and efficacious therapies will remain out of reach.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.