Why venture debt funding could save Aussie founders a motser and let them keep control of their startups
Published 20-MAR-2019 14:23 P.M.
4 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
There’s no end to the long line of early stage startups looking for cash to grow. After burning through first round FFF (friends, families and fools) capital, they often hit a wall raising working capital. With growth capabilities from revenue either non-existent or insufficient, most are forced to sell off large chunks of shares to equity investors.
However the euphoria of the deal and the memory of clinking champagne glasses fade long before the ink is even dry on the contracts as founders get a reality check. They are no longer rulers of their domain, masters of their created universe.
Giving up a large amount of equity for capital can be a good thing. It can provide freedom to grow where previously there was no possibility. Often though it’s just a turkey shoot.
The people I deal with make their money from taking equity in return for injecting capital into ventures. So I know my comments will make me unpopular with some people. But the VC industry globally is generally toxic. It’s mostly an old boys club mindset that takes as much as it can get and leaves founders with enough to just swim. Founders need to learn to swim with the sharks without being eaten alive.
Venture capital investments in Australia hit a record in the 2017/2018 financial year. KPMG’s “Venture Pulse Q2 2018” report showed that a total of A$849 million went to new businesses across multiple sectors. This was up 12% from the previous year even though the number of deals was less. All of this was equity capital.
In 2018 Australia opened its doors to venture debt funding. Startups in the USA have had access to venture debt funding since the 1980s. Two ventures that are household names and successfully leveraged venture debt in the 2000s were Facebook and YouTube.
Unlike regular venture capital investments made in return for shares in a company, debt funding is a loan that does not involve equity dilution. It usually complements equity funding and is typically structured as a three year term loan with stock warrants or stock options.
Growth Stage startups in Australia can now look to companies that provide growth loans to help to close the gap between debt and equity. These are different to equity venture capital funds that often rape and pillage start-ups and have ruled the startup financing sector with a death grip for a very long time.
As more funds enter the venture debt market, Aussie founders of Growth Stage startups will benefit the most. However well placed Early and Series A stage startups will benefit as the pool of quality Growth Stage ventures gradually evaporates.
The equity capital industry will only change when Early and Series A stage founders start to think differently about the challenges facing them. When they think differently about their own responsibility and accountability. This will lead them to take action that forces change. Venture debt funding is an excellent opportunity for founders in Australia to step up.
The rising popularity of such funding globally is good news for Aussie startups that are often not considered creditworthy by banks due to a lack of collateral or profitability. They may also not want to raise funds against equity at an early stage when their shares are worth little.
Equity financing often leaves founders holding very little in their ventures which is a problem for the founder if the venture makes it big. Venture debt funding solves this problem.
Venture debt gives the startup a chance to raise funds without diluting equity. It provides an alternative source for all cash needs of a growing business, allowing them to achieve key milestones before raising a fresh equity funding. It can also be leveraged to pick funds at higher valuation with less dilution, in the next equity round.
In addition, venture debt is slightly cheaper than loans from non-banking financial companies who can charge up to 18% and more per annum interest. Venture debt funding is typically around 14% - 15%.
Although venture debt funding appears to be a safer option for founders, it should not be seen as a complete replacement for equity financing. It’s often part of an overall package. For one, venture debt funds need an exit too and therefore lend only to startups that are well positioned to raise follow-on equity funding.
Risks still remain. If a company is not able to raise the next round of funding, the investment can become a non-performing asset. Whether during a funding boom like between 2014 and 2015, that saw random funding create inflated valuations causing valuation corrections of major new names only a couple of years later, or just generally, your ability to raise new capital in the next round will impact the venture debt funders decision. If capital can’t be raised you could be left with very little, or nothing, after the mess has been cleaned up.
Paul J. Lange is founder of The Hedonist Entrepreneur Initiative and a 30 year veteran of the private equity industry.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.