April Fools: Facebook continues to have the last laugh
You could be forgiven for believing that technology (and in particular social media) has gotten away from society.
What was once built as a way to enhance communication and bring people closer together has now become the opposite.
One need look no further than the March 15 Christchurch mosque shootings to support this claim, which saw Facebook struggle to contain the spread of graphic live stream footage.
Despite having more tools at its disposal than ever before, Facebook allowed the original live stream to roll for 17 minutes before it was shut down.
17 minutes. Is anyone awake at the wheel?
“We have heard feedback that we must do more – and we agree,” Facebook’s COO Sheryl Sandberg said.
She added, “In the immediate aftermath, we took down the alleged terrorist’s Facebook and Instagram accounts, removed the video of the attack, and used artificial intelligence to proactively find and prevent related videos from being posted.
“In the wake of the terrorist attack, we are taking three steps: strengthening the rules for using Facebook Live, taking further steps to address hate on our platforms, and supporting the New Zealand community,” Sandberg concluded.
So now, almost one month later, what has Facebook done in the ‘aftermath’ of this tragedy?
New Zealand’s Privacy Commissioner John Edwards reached out to the social media giant earlier this week for an update on its live streaming platform.
In his query Edwards, asked, “Is there anything that Facebook has done in relation to the live-streaming service since March 15, which if it had done before [then] would have either prevented the live-stream occurring or ensured it could have been more promptly detected and either halted, or referred for human review?”
The response? “No.”
Wait, that can’t be right? Surely they’d have changed something?
“To their credit, Facebook did answer my direct question,” Edwards tweeted to his followers.
If Facebook is awarded brownie points for answering a simple question, then our expectations need a major overhaul.
Last Saturday in an open letter, Facebook’s founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg asked governments to have a ‘more active role’ in combating hate speech.
“From what I’ve learned, I believe we need new regulation in four areas: harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data portability.”
But this is the same Zuckerberg that allowed Cambridge Analytica to acquire data on 30 million Facebook user profiles, to which he said, “It was my mistake, and I’m sorry. I started Facebook, I run it, and I’m responsible for what happens here.”
Historically Facebook has not waited for governments to catch up. It’s a disruptor at heart. It can set the example.
17 minutes was 17 minutes too long, it’s time to walk the talk.
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (CAR No.433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information only. Any advice is general advice only. Neither your personal objectives, financial situation nor needs have been taken into consideration. Accordingly you should consider how appropriate the advice (if any) is to those objectives, financial situation and needs, before acting on the advice.
Conflict of Interest Notice
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd does and seeks to do business with companies featured in its articles. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this article. Investors should consider this article as only a single factor in making any investment decision. The publishers of this article also wish to disclose that they may hold this stock in their portfolios and that any decision to purchase this stock should be done so after the purchaser has made their own inquires as to the validity of any information in this article.
The information contained in this article is current at the finalised date. The information contained in this article is based on sources reasonably considered to be reliable by S3 Consortium Pty Ltd, and available in the public domain. No “insider information” is ever sourced, disclosed or used by S3 Consortium.