Housing Affordability and the Budget
In the lead-up, it was parroted as a budget for housing affordability, but the Australian Government Budget 2017 has now been released, and it seems that potential first home buyers have been fed another line.
Last night’s budget, whilst doing a lot to address housing, does very little to address housing affordability.
For example, there is the much hyped super-for-housing-deposits scheme, which allows first home buyers to use concessional super contributions to get a foot the housing market. This will only serve to increase the amount of money circulating in the property market, and should therefore have no downward effect on house prices.
The other measure aims to incentivise downsizing for those over 65, by allowing them to contribute $300,000 of the proceeds of a sale of their main residence to their superannuation, above the $1.6 million cap announced in the last budget. It is possible that this measure will help to increase the supply of housing to the market, which may help affordability. However, even if these seniors do downsize, they will likely purchase a new property in which to reside, meaning that there should be little net increase for houses on the market, and little change in prices as a result.
Our housing is expensive. In fact, on a price to income basis, Sydney is the second most expensive city for housing on earth. Melbourne is fourth. Furthering the issue is the fact that wages in Australia have recently been stagnating whilst house prices have been rising.
So what gives? How can prices continue to rise when they’re already expensive, and when people are earning less?
One potential answer is foreign real estate investment. Over the past 12-months, foreign real estate investment has risen by 36.8 percent, according to the latest data from the Foreign Investment Review Board.
Chinese investors were the most prevalent of foreign investors, accounting for a fifth of the total foreign investment, with two-thirds of Chinese investment funds heading into real estate markets.
Some in the real estate industry believe that new rules in parts China to limit property speculation have pushed Chinese property investment offshore, whilst the introduction of a foreigner buyer surcharge in Victoria in 2015 appears to have had little effect in dampening demand; Victoria accounted for 44 percent of foreign investment approvals in real estate.
Whilst many Australians believe that the housing affordability issue needs some attention, I doubt they will be overwhelmed by the measures in the 2017 budget. Nevertheless, it is encouraging that the issue is being considered and addressed.
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (CAR No.433913) is a corporate authorised representative of Maven Capital Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 418504). The information contained in this article is general information only. Any advice is general advice only. Neither your personal objectives, financial situation nor needs have been taken into consideration. Accordingly you should consider how appropriate the advice (if any) is to those objectives, financial situation and needs, before acting on the advice.
Conflict of Interest Notice
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd does and seeks to do business with companies featured in its articles. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this article. Investors should consider this article as only a single factor in making any investment decision. The publishers of this article also wish to disclose that they may hold this stock in their portfolios and that any decision to purchase this stock should be done so after the purchaser has made their own inquires as to the validity of any information in this article.
The information contained in this article is current at the finalised date. The information contained in this article is based on sources reasonably considered to be reliable by S3 Consortium Pty Ltd, and available in the public domain. No “insider information” is ever sourced, disclosed or used by S3 Consortium.