Why iron ore spiked, and why it probably won’t last
Published 08-MAR-2016 11:26 A.M.
4 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
You may have seen around the place that the price of iron ore jumped by upwards of 19% yesterday, but this seems to be squarely in the ‘spike’ category rather than a catalyst moment.
In case you missed it, the price of iron ore went from $US52.40 ($A70.13) to $62.20 per tonne, with the 19% spike on of the largest single day gain for at least five years.
So, what prompted it all?
The Chinese government is now targeting growth of 6.5% to 7%, quite healthy growth figures which suggest the central government is going to attempt to keep the foot on the accelerator rather than cool the overheated market.
It also seems that comments from Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, the second most powerful man in China, prompted the spike by saying that the country would spend 800 billion yuan ($A164.3 billion) or railway construction and 1.65 trillion yuan on building roads.
Both of those things require steel, which in turn requires iron ore.
The announcement was likely in response to a flagging manufacturing sector in China, which has suffered with overcapacity issues.
In short, there’s not enough work for them to do, which is rare.
One Australian company, NSL Consolidated (ASX:NSL) has sought to take advantage of this situation by effectively re-negotiating contracts on key fabrication orders.
Iron ore which has been shipped from China has merely been stockpiled, laying in wait until there’s actually enough construction drivers for manufacturers to use all that steel.
The picture wasn’t great for iron ore exporters going into 2016, either.
According to Shanghai Steelhome Information Technology Co., which tracks commodities in Chinese ports, there was 93.1 million tonnes of iron ore laying in wait at Chinese ports in the final reading of 2015.
So, the demand driver will clear all that capacity from the ports as manufacturers start building rail and roads, right?
Several commentators and analysts have told investors to cool their jets on the news.
Bloomberg quoted chief investment officer of wealth management at Northern Trust Corp Katherine Nixon as saying that the spike was more a function of trading than market fundamentals.
“These kinds of rallies tend to be rare and short-lived,” Nixon said in an interview with Bloomberg Television on Monday. “You had deeply oversold markets that had significant short positions that people are rushing back into cover.”
Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal quoted analyst from Societe Generale Robin Bhar, backing up Nixon’s position that it was more about the market than the actual buying of steel or iron ore.
“We don’t have enough evidence to suggest a turnaround. We’re not seeing a huge upswing in [physical] buying,” he was quoted as saying. “This is a short-covering bounce.”
The message here was that traders had positions against Chinese growth, but when the Chinese Premier made his remarks it prompted a lot of panic selling of positions.
The spike was related to trading more than evidence that steel production is picking back up, and if the government’s ambitious plans do come off they will take a number of months to work through.
That’s why the spike is unlikely to last in the shorter term, but if the Chinese government is able to work through the plans then there could be an easing of the oversupply which currently characterises the iron ore market.
In fact, investors should perhaps be a touch worried by the aggressive targets set out by the Chinese government.
There’s a school of thought that the growth in China in recent years was really build on a house of cards – fuelled by currency manipulation and less than reputable data.
It was also partially built on spiralling debt from China’s private companies which were given a mandate to build, build, build.
In fact, private Chinese debt is thought to be more than 200% of GDP – which is hardly a good news story.
The credit was mainly obtained to keep up the pace of modernisation in China, which involved the building of new buildings, roads, rail – and for a while there was good return on investment.
As you reach a point where there is less need for those things, the return, particularly on real estate, becomes less.
So will simply trying to stimulate the economy through another round of infrastructure necessarily work to get China’s GDP to that 6.5% to 7% mark? You may very well see short term spikes at play, but it hardly seems sustainable.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.