Next Investors logo grey

Should BHP freeze its dividend? – OPINION

Published 19-JAN-2016 16:25 P.M.

|

2 minute read

Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.

In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.

The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.

Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.


Click Here to View Latest Articles

Ahead of its update release tomorrow, the question on its dividend policy has shifted from whether it can afford to drop its dividend policy to whether it can afford to keep it.

Australians have been investing in the big miner for years, and BHP has made sure the investment from shareholders (actually, more than likely the funds which hold the stock) has kept on flowing, partially by maintaining an attractive dividend policy.

The prevailing sentiment was that it was always wise to have some BHP in the cupboard, as in times of feast you’d get the upside of raging commodity markets while in times of famine, at least you’d have the dividend to keep you sustained.

The past year or so, however, commodities have taken a well-publicised tumble.

Earlier this month, it made the call to write down its investment in the US shale sector by $7.2 billion in the face of plunging oil prices.

Iran coming back to the international fold and starting trade again is hardly going to help matters in that regard, either.

To be fair, BHP has attempted to get out in front of its US investment going south rather than just lump it in with tomorrow’s operations update or February’s financial update.

That’s good corporate practice, and it should be applauded.

It noted that it’s already cut costs to the bone in its US business by operating only ‘wet’ assets, and that’s mainly so it can keep its foot on the acreage.

So there’s not a heck of a lot of room to cut spending. It may be able to cut future, theoretical spending, but the actual amount can’t actually be reduced that much further than it currently is.

The event was a timely reminder of just how much pressure is on its bottom line – and subsequently its dividend policy will be scrutinised by investors.

According to its 2015 annual set of books, BHP had cash equivalents of $6.7 billion. This was after paying out dividends for the year amounting to $6.6 billion.

However, with a stated position of wanting to progressively increase dividends and an expected drop in cash on hand associated with the downturn in commodities – it’s clear that something’s got to give.

With its cash on hand expected to reduce and its steadfast commitment to increasing dividends, it will have a cash shortfall to make up.

It can do this by either selling off assets or borrowing money – but it’s hardly a great look to be selling off assets or picking up debt in order to maintain a dividend.

BHP has said it will say something about its dividend policy in February, and it’s increasingly likely that BHP will seek to freeze dividend growth or maybe even trim it a touch.

The question is whether the market has already priced this in, or whether any moves on dividends will shock the market.

Any commentary on dividends tomorrow may just be read as readying the market for a big move.



General Information Only

S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.

Conflicts of Interest Notice

S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.

Publication Notice and Disclaimer

The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.

Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.