Next Investors logo grey

Sex tapes, lawsuits, and profit

Published 27-MAY-2016 11:01 A.M.


4 minute read

Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.

In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.

The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.

Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.

Click Here to View Latest Articles

You may not be aware, but, in a round-about way, hedge funds are appearing in court rooms more and more.

Take the Hulk Hogan case for example.

Over the last 48 hours, media has been rife with the news Peter Thiel, one of the so-called ‘Paypal Mafia’ was effectively bankrolling Terry ‘Hulk Hogan’ Bollea’s multi-million defamation lawsuit against website Gawker.

Gawker had published a sex tape featuring Hulk Hogan.

Hogan sued and was successful in being awarded $140 million after a Florida jury found the publishing of the sex tape wasn’t in the public interest.

It was an amount the publisher gawked at (pun fully intended) – but what the jury and many didn’t know until now was that Thiel gave Bollea $10 million to mount his defence.

In an interview with the New York Times (where you can read the full background on the case), Thiel said the funding was part of a larger agenda against Gawker – the publication which had effectively outed him as gay back in 2007.

As people digested the news that Thiel was secretly bankrolling the case, all kinds of juicy questions around whether or not money and power should reach that far into the justice system entered into the discussion.

Here was a multi-billionaire using his wealth to effectively influence the law of the land and actively go after an organisation using his financial muscle.

People, pretty rightly, were uncomfortable with the idea that money could effectively buy a way into the court room and decide which cases make it to trial and which don’t.

Add the rise of the class action lawsuit and you have a heady mix of power and politics potentially influencing court room decisions.

You’d be surprised to learn that hedge funds are already funding litigation in the hopes of seeing a profit.

It’s known as lawsuit funding – and it’s a growing trend in the US.

Hedge fund EJF Capital made waves early last year when it announced that it was moving into the litigation funding game by bankrolling several law firms who were pursuing mass class action law suits – in return for a slice of the payout should the case be won by the plaintiff.

It was quick to point out that it didn’t actually play a role in which cases the law firms decided to pursue – but this was big money effectively greasing the wheels of litigation.

Would many of the class action law suits have made it this far without the EJF funding?

At a time when the rise of the class action lawsuit has caused consternation in the legal profession, do we really need another source of capital to enable even more class actions to come to the fore?

Many advocates of litigation funding point out the cost of mounting a case is increasing at a rapid rate and it can be difficult for those not well-resourced to make it to court to seek some kind of justice or remedy without the cash.

Would Hulk Hogan been able to take Gawker to court if Thiel hadn’t tipped $10 million into the defence?

Of course it goes beyond wrestlers and sex tapes – many bankrolled class action lawsuits involve things like taking a bank to court over exorbitant credit card fees and the environmental destruction of a key area.

There is a legitimate place for litigation funders looking to take a profit – and several mechanisms exist to keep cases from being called solely for this purpose, but does commercialising the legal system really lead to great outcomes?

Companies such as Burford are starting to spring up solely to fund litigation.

Burford was behind the law suit against Chevron on behalf of Ecuadorians for environmental damage – and one key figure, attorney Steven Donzinger, loomed large.

He was successful in initially persuading an Ecuadorian court to slap Chevron with a $19 billion fine, but Chevron managed to secure a ruling in New York after alleging the suit involved coercion, bribery, and fabricated evidence.

By that point in time, Burford had sold off its ‘stake’ in the litigation to another investor, according to Bloomberg.

Did attempting to secure a return for his investors play any sort of role in Donzinger’s alleged coercion, bribery, and fabricated evidence?

It’s a tricky area – to say the least.

What’s more surprising is that the litigation-happy US jurisdiction isn’t leading the practice, rather places like the UK and little old Australia are leading the way.

Australia has the world’s largest litigation funder, IMF Bentham.

It’s listed on the ASX, too.

IMF Bentham boasts impressive numbers in its investment portfolio.

Stats from the BMF website

Stats from the IMF Bentham website

Again, there are some rules around this behaviour so it doesn’t get out of hand – but it’s an interesting thing to consider.

While everybody is shocked that a Silicon Valley billionaire is funding a wrestler’s sex tape case in what appears to be an attempt at some kind of revenge – hedge funds have been trying to profit from the legal system for years.

What’s more shocking?

General Information Only

S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.

Conflicts of Interest Notice

S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.

Publication Notice and Disclaimer

The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.

Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.