From PR disasters to ‘digital influencers’
Published 06-JUL-2017 12:01 P.M.
5 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
In a world dominated by public perception, PR management can make or break a company. George Tchetvertakov spoke with InsideOut PR Director Nicole Reaney, about the role of PR in Business.
Whether you’re a multinational, a start-up, or even a charity — getting your intended message out to your audience (and fast) is now just as important as the underlying business operations themselves.
The larger a company becomes, the larger its market footprint, and the higher the need for dedicated PR.
“For large blue-chip companies, public relations is simply essential,” Director of Sydney-based firm InsideOut PR, Nicole Reaney said.
“Regardless of a business’ size, it’s crucial for firms to consider their reputation, as if it was a bank account. By investing time into your stakeholder relationships, reputations can appreciate, but by the same token, they can depreciate on the back of avoidable blunders.
“The unfortunate reality is that it only takes a momentary lapse of judgment, for years of solid reputational work to be undone,” she said.
Nicole Reaney has worked across a number successful PR and experiential campaigns for some of Australia’s most prominent brands including Colgate-Palmolive, Nestle, Coke, Dyson and King Furniture. Her career was fast-tracked when she became Colgate-Palmolive’s Corporate Affairs Manager and Media Spokesperson for the South Pacific at just 23 years old.
Founded by Reaney in 2005, InsideOutPR not only caters for traditional PR methods such as print media, television, online and radio, but is steadfastly moving into its next evolution: online social influence.
Securing the support of digital influencers
In modern business, sophisticated methods of managing public image and perception are gradually claiming their share of the overall PR pie. One technique that’s especially popular is employing ‘digital influencers’.
Over the last decade, blogging has transformed from hobby to commercial pursuit. Some bloggers can attract audiences rivalling those of national TV channels and major newspapers, but at a fraction of the cost from an advertiser’s perspective.
“Successful public relations [PR] is about creating dialogue amongst business stakeholders. This can mean customers, vendors, investors, third party partners or regulators; the goal is to foster engaging communication and build long-lasting relationships through building trust and confidence,” Reaney said.
Potential audiences in the billions
The insatiable growth of the Internet has driven sizeable growth rates in sales, revenues, customer reach and global coverage for the most digitally-savvy companies across almost all sectors. Yet with the growth of online interactions comes a slew of challenges.
“The key factors are authenticity and trust, between the firm and its stakeholders. Digital influencers carry remarkable authenticity and are considered far more trustworthy than traditional ads, by their respective audiences. At InsideOutPR, we’re responding to this dramatic shift in market preferences, and integrating digital influencers into our broader PR activity for our clients,” Reaney said.
If a company loses control over its public image, the results can be catastrophic for both the firm’s value and its public reputation.
Recent examples of poorly executed PR-campaigns include Coopers Beers partnership with the Bible Society using the slogan “Keeping it Light” when referencing its new brand of beer. (Cue marriage equality-themed boycotts from pubs and bars across Sydney and Melbourne.)
And who can forget United Airlines’ decision to forcibly remove a paying customer from its plane, because it was overbooked.
A slip of the tongue = ‘doing a Ratner’
The Ratner Group was a British stock market darling in the 1980s, having come from nowhere as a tiny start-up and growing into a publicly-listed company with over 900 high-street stores in the UK and 1,000 in the US. In 1991, the firm was riding a wave of momentum after announcing £120 million in annual profit.
Over a decade’s work in building the Ratner image was unceremoniously sullied by a speech given by its then-Chairman & CEO Gerald Ratner at the Institute of Directors Annual Convention in 1991.
Ratner’s store in London in 1990s (main) and former Ratner’s CEO, Gerald Ratner (inset)
Here are the offending remarks in full, said to dozens of key stakeholders and investors – and repeated to the public in the next day’s newspapers:
We also do cut-glass sherry decanters complete with six glasses on a silver-plated tray that your butler can serve you drinks on, all for £4.95. People say, “How can you sell this for such a low price?”, I say, “because it’s total crap”.
As if it couldn’t get any worse, moments later in the speech, Ratner shed further light on the quality of the products his company manufactured: “Our jewellery is cheaper than a Marks & Spencer’s prawn sandwich, but probably wouldn’t last as long.”
Ratner’s unintended self-immolation led to £500 million pounds being wiped off the value of the Ratner Group, paved the company’s sale to a bitter rival, and was left with no choice but to change its once-proud family name.
Over 20 years since Mr. Ratner’s infamous speech, the act of committing a spectacular public relations gaffe is colloquially known as ‘doing a Ratner’. Several years down the track, the ex-director penned a book giving his personal take on his PR howler.
In the book, Ratner delves into other aspects of his career (aside from his now infamous speech) and how he managed to steer a small jewellery business from 2% market share to over 35%, in under a decade — an achievement few other CEOs have accomplished.
Ratner’s gaffe took place over 25 years ago, before the Internet had turbocharged the PR-cycle. Today there’s now a lot more to play for, and a lot more to lose. Endless public scrutiny, the 24-hour news cycle, social media influence and breakneck response rates mean that public relations has never mattered more; nor have the impacts of PR gaffes been so great.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.