Playing the blame game in CBA’s money laundering scandal
Published 22-AUG-2017 11:16 A.M.
3 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
It turns out that ‘smart’ ATMs aren’t that smart after all.
Since civil proceedings were opened against the Commonwealth Bank of Australia on August 3, the Australian financial agency has revealed that CBA is being sued for over 53,000 breaches of law, with the bank failing to report on $77 million of suspicious transactions stemming from its smart ATMs.
It’s understood that one particular laundering operation saw over $21 million deposited across 11 CBA accounts between February 2015 and May 2016.
The repercussions have been significant, with shareholders bearing the brunt of the blow.
CBA shares fell four percent on August 4, and have fallen over seven percent since Austrac presented its case against the banking giant.
The past performance of this product is not and should not be taken as an indication of future performance. Caution should be exercised in assessing past performance. This product, like all other financial products, is subject to market forces and unpredictable events that may adversely affect future performance.
The scandal has already claimed CBA chief executive Ian Narev, who will depart at the conclusion of the current financial year.
Peter Clark, who is the acting chief executive of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (Austrac), indicated that Westpac, ANZ and National Australia Bank had been cleared of wrongdoing.
“We’ve looked at the other major banks in particular and we have not identified the same issues with those banks,” he said on August 18.
CBA has reaffirmed that it accepted the investigation and was cooperating with Austrac personnel.
Austrac believes up to four organisations deposited amounts at thresholds low enough to avoid initial suspicion. It’s alleged that the bank also ignored advice from the Australian Federal Police, which indicated that a number of the accounts involved where the subject of an ongoing investigation into serious criminal offences, including terrorism.
Despite becoming aware of the suspicious activity, CBA allowed the transactions to continue.
Austrac’s statement of claim – which was presented to the federal court – believes CBA was not exhaustive enough in the R&D phase of its smart ATMs.
CBA’s Intelligent Deposit Machines hit the streets in May 2012, with the aim of providing a quick and convenient form of banking for customers on the go. The ATMs count deposits automatically, in an effort to reduce waiting times that stem from human tellers.
Unfortunately, it didn’t take long for criminal elements to find ways to manipulate the system.
In just three years, CBA failed to flag 53,000 transactions which exceeded $10,000, the amount that must be reported to Austrac.
Outgoing CBA chief executive Ian Narev has indicated that a software error was the culprit behind thousands of transactions falling through the cracks.
“One very important piece of context here is that the vast majority of cases is related to one software coding error in 2012 that we picked up in 2015, fixed within a month and rectified,” he said.
How is this possible?
The ATMs allowed unlimited anonymous deposits into an account, which meant untraceable transactions totalling thousands could be made at will.
ABC business editor Ian Verrender has since urged banks to reconsider their reliance on technology.
“My gut feeling is that banks and all sorts of corporations over the years have replaced human beings with machines, intelligent machines, thinking the machines will do everything you do,” he said.
“I think they’ve just cut down on the number of staff, the number of people who are looking at compliance issues, and the numbers of people who are supposed to police and monitor these type of issues.”
He added that the fines heading CBA’s way were ‘extraordinary’.
“$18 million is the maximum fine deliverable for failing to notify the regulator of transactions exceeding $10,000. You’ve got more than 53,000 issues in dispute here. So, you know... do the maths.”
Phillip Lowe, who is the governor of the Reserve Bank, spoke on the issue August 11.
“Banks should not be participating in money laundering, and they should know who is operating the accounts they open,” he said.
“It’s very serious. We have these laws for a reason.”
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.