It took Tesla 4x less years to reap a higher market cap than Samsung
Electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has witnessed a tremendous increase in its market capitalisation, directly competing with other established technology industry players in existence for decades writes Oliver Scott.
Data calculated and analysed by Finbold indicates that it took Tesla at least four times less years to amass a higher market capitalisation than South Korea’s electronic giant Samsung. As of March 23, 2021, Tesla was only 18 years old with a market capitalisation of $643.10 billion, which is higher than 83-year old Samsung with a market cap of $484.19 billion.
We have compared the two companies because they are both in the technology industry and are established leaders in their specific niches. Furthermore, both companies have a similar market capitalisation, and they are leading manufactures.
The analysis compares the age and market cap of the other eight selected companies. Apple, founded 45 years ago, has the highest market capitalisation of $2.07 trillion.
Why Tesla’s market cap has soared in fewer years
Despite being two big players in the tech world, Tesla’s market capitalisation has obviously grown at a faster rate to rank higher than Samsung. The rapid surge has been aided by the fact that the company is benefitting from a general euphoria around electronic vehicle stocks, alongside the tightening of emissions regulations globally. The firm has also cemented its position as a key player in the electric vehicle market hence poised for growth.
Worth mentioning is that Tesla’s market capitalisation significantly grew in 2020. The stock split made it more affordable for individual investors to own a part of Tesla driving retail investor enthusiasm. At the same, the firm benefitted from the surge in technology stock witnessed during the coronavirus pandemic. Since going public in 2010, Tesla’s stock has ballooned by over 20,000%, while last year alone, the stock rocketed by over 700%.
Furthermore, Tesla CEO Elon Musk can not be overlooked in the company’s market cap growth. Musk is outspoken and commands a loyal social media following through platforms like Twitter. He inspires an army of Tesla proponents and investors thanks to success accomplished by his other affiliated ventures like SpaceX and PayPal. Musk’s position in the tech industry cannot be easily emulated by other tech industry players.
Samsung market cap growth derailed
As Tesla’s market surged over the past decade since going public in 2010, Samsung has fluctuated. The market cap has benefited from the company’s position as one of the leading 5G chipmakers. The demand for 5G chips and devices has surged as the technology continues to take center stage.
However, the market cap’s growth partly stalled amid corruption scandals that hit the company. The conglomerate’s Vice Chairman and heir Jay Y were arrested over a corruption scandal linked to former South Korea President Geun-hye. Such instances slowed down the company’s growth in valuation, giving room for new players like Tesla to surge forward. Although Tesla has been hit with several controversies, especially on meeting demand, the events have not significantly affected its valuation.
Samsung also faces stiff competition as competitors like Huawei continues to slash the prices of their smartphones. Furthermore, Huawei also leads with the highest share of 5G-ready devices globally, while Samsung lags behind. Elsewhere, Tesla continues to be a market leader in the EV sector, fuelling electric vehicles’ mass adoption globally.
Although Tesla has used fewer years to amass a higher market cap than Samsung, both companies differ in profits. For 2020, Tesla reported a profit of $721 million while Samsung recorded about $32.1 billion.
Although Tesla’s market cap has surged sharply, there have been concerns from different financial sector players. Some predict it will soar even higher, while others urge investors to be cautious, stating the stock is driven mainly by speculation.
Author: Oliver Scott
Oliver is a revolutionist in the sense that he embraces change as it comes. He is passionate about blockchain, digital assets, the Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, and all evolving technologies. At Finbold.com Oliver covers data-driven stories and researches that reveal meaningful insights for the reader.
This article was originally published on Finbold.com
Short-term positions in small, early stage ASX companies,
with high potential and near term price catalysts.
Focusing on resource exploration, early-stage tech, and biotech.
Exceptional opportunities across a broad range of
early-stage growth sectors with strong management.
Seeking 1,000% plus returns across medium to long-term holds.
Longer-term positions in a variety of sectors.
Seeking strong management where traction is established and have entered into a growth phase.
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (CAR No.433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information only. Any advice is general advice only. Neither your personal objectives, financial situation nor needs have been taken into consideration. Accordingly you should consider how appropriate the advice (if any) is to those objectives, financial situation and needs, before acting on the advice.
Conflict of Interest Notice
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd does and seeks to do business with companies featured in its articles. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this article. Investors should consider this article as only a single factor in making any investment decision. The publishers of this article also wish to disclose that they may hold this stock in their portfolios and that any decision to purchase this stock should be done so after the purchaser has made their own inquires as to the validity of any information in this article.
The information contained in this article is current at the finalised date. The information contained in this article is based on sources reasonably considered to be reliable by S3 Consortium Pty Ltd, and available in the public domain. No “insider information” is ever sourced, disclosed or used by S3 Consortium.