Is the taxi industry finally taking new technology seriously?
Published 11-NOV-2015 12:00 P.M.
3 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is holding fire on its authorisation of smartphone taxi booking app, ihail, further delaying the taxi wars that are currently gripping the nation.
Disruptive technology vs archaic systems and protocols have fuelled the angst between the traditional taxi service and upstart Uber, however through the ihail app, the taxi industry hopes to make up some ground.
However it will have to wait until at least February or March 2016, when the ACCC is expected to hand down its final warning.
The delay is in line with a submission by ihail today with regard to proposed changes to how its booking app will operate.
Last month the ACCC said in a draft determination that it was proposing to deny authorisation to ihail on competitive grounds.
ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said: “The ACCC considers that the ihail app would have a significant impact on competition in the taxi industry, which could impact prices and quality of service.
“The ACCC accepts this app would provide a more convenient way for consumers to book taxi services, but in the draft determination the ACCC takes the view that this comes at too big a cost to competition.
“The ACCC estimates that the initial ihail shareholders represent more than half of all taxis in Australia, and a larger share in the metropolitan areas where the app would operate.
“This would guarantee that from its launch, the ihail app would have a larger fleet of taxis, in a broader range of locations, than any existing taxi booking apps. Depending on the rate of take up of the ihail app amongst other taxi networks, it could potentially grow to include all taxi networks in any area.”
“There are a number of apps that already provide access to large fleets of taxis across multiple locations. The growth in these existing apps is being driven by competition to attract drivers and customers. ihail will achieve a potentially dominant position from launch – not through competition, but because of the larger fleet of taxis its ownership structure delivers.
“The ACCC considers that the proposed arrangements are likely to produce significant public detriments. They will reduce competition between taxi networks in supplying services using the ihail app and, the arrangements may tip the market towards ihail becoming the dominant booking app.
“If it becomes the dominant booking app, it may also reduce competition by impacting the commercial viability of existing apps operated by individual taxi networks, as well as those operated by third parties such as goCatch and ingogo,” explained Chairman Sims.
goCatch and ingogo are further spanners in the digital disruption of the taxi industry.
Recently taxi booking app goCatch signed a deal with ASX-listed Mint Payments to hijack the lucrative payments market from start-up rival Ingogo and major incumbent Cabcharge.
“Roughly half of all taxi jobs in Australia are hailed from the street or taxi rank, representing a big opportunity for goCatch to monetise payments for these journeys,” goCatch chief executive Ned Moorfield told The Australian Financial Review.
Cabcharge sees this as an ‘invasion’ into its terriroty, but is suffering on other ways as well after regulation in NSW, Victoria and WA cut its 10% surcharge by half applied on credit and debit card transactions for taxi trips.
Traditional players have been hit hard as a new world order stakes its claims.
And we should see further changes to come and those old reactionary companies phased out if they do not take a pro-active approach.
Taxi industry gets the message
At least the taxi industry has finally come to realise this and is looking at how technology can enhance its service offering and rebuild its reputation, rather than just conducting half-baked rallies that a new and better informed general public scoff at.
To be fair the taxi industry says it only wants to bring to light the lack of regulation afforded Uber, but Uber’s counter claim is that the protest was driven by taxi investors not drivers.
The only winner here is technology and the taxi industry has seen the light, finally admitting that it is behind the times and abandoning its attack on Uber.
It is now taking measures to win back consumer confidence.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.