Don’t discount the diversity dividend
Published 14-OCT-2016 12:19 P.M.
6 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
We tend to hear the word ‘diversity’ and think of political correctness, quotas or ‘social awareness’. It’s a term potentially covering difference in gender, culture, age, sexuality and language.
When we look at increasing the diversity of a company board, or its senior management, we too often adopt a yawn-inducing tone of obligation. Like it’s about a moral decision rather than a business one.
But perhaps we’ve got that wrong.
Diversity in business – while yes, bringing its own set of challenges – is being rightly seen more and more as an advantage in multicultural societies, where we’re catering to younger generations who increasingly see the world as without real geographical boundaries.
We can travel as much as our income will allow; we can marry someone on the other side of the world we met online; we can conduct a business with those on a different continent. We can even learn another language through a $5 app.
A transnational world
We are also seeing a new group of global citizens – ‘transnational migrants’ – who have fluid ethnic identities and a complex sense of home.
But if you take a look at the board and senior management of Australia’s biggest companies and institutions, they rarely reflect the diversity of our modern society.
New Zealander law expert Mai Chen spoke at the Women World Changers Summit I recently attended in Melbourne. Ms Chen is Managing Partner at Chen Palmer, Professor at the University of Auckland School of Law, Director of BNZ and a best-selling author.
Her topic was superdiversity – a term referring to the proportion and number of ethnicities in one place. Melbourne, she noted, is one of the world’s most superdiverse cities with 26% of our population born overseas and originating from more than 150 countries (source: Victorian Multicultural Commission, 2015).
That’s not even taking into account second generation Australians (born here but with at least one parent born overseas) which in 2011 made up 20% of the population. Such statistics suggest that the homogeneity present in our top leadership positions is not so much ‘natural’ but habitual. Is it really meritocracy or is it the power of the status quo?
Also mingled with the term superdiversity is the idea of a diversity of diversity. This refers to individuals who tick more than one box on the ‘diversity’ checklist, for example women of mixed ethnicity, disabled migrants or aging LGBTIQ people.
The people who once were marginalised by the term ‘minorities’ could potentially, collectively, become the majority as more and more people migrate and inter-marry.
What does this mean for business?
In Ms Chen’s ‘Superdiversity Stocktake’ report released last year she talks about the implications of superdiversity for business and the government in NZ.
On the topic of migrants, she outlines this advantage: “Businesses will only retain market share if they win more diverse customers. Migrant customers, including tourists, represent a significant, untapped revenue stream for some businesses.
“The advantage of migrant customers is that they are new in New Zealand, so businesses do not have to win them away from competing businesses.”
The report cites several case studies showing the success of diverse workforces, when properly cultivated. One such example is Beca, a 3000 strong professional services consultancy in the Asia Pacific region.
Beca is 100 per cent employee-owned, and as at 2015 had more than 50 nationalities and 70 languages represented among its staff.
During the 2000s, Matt Ensor – the current business director at Beca – actively recruited staff from Asia to meet demand from a boom in global engineering. The percentage of migrants in Beca’s team went from almost none in 2002 to approximately 50 per cent a few years later.
To meet the challenges involved in a culturally diverse workforce, Mr Ensor developed a tailor-made development program for staff outlining nine ‘cultural mysteries’ that make employees successful in a New Zealand business.
“The team became the most successful of its type in New Zealand, and is now a talent magnet that attracts the best transport engineers in the world,” the report said. Mr Ensor still works at Beca and externally promotes the benefits of effective cultural diversity leadership practices.
Checking in on gender diversity
When it comes to increasing the number of women leaders in business we have made good strides in Australia, and across the world, but there is still a lot of ground left to cover.
More and more companies are seeing the benefits of having female representation on their boards, or having women head up their teams. This changes the conversation from what businesses ‘should’ care about to what they need to care about for their success.
In this AFR article on CEO bonuses relating to diversity quotas, Group Executive at Investa, Michael Cook, claims some people believe bonuses for meeting diversity quotas are patronising.
“We have diversity targets and we are reaping the benefit, but we don’t use bonuses,” Mr Cook said. “I think our senior female staff would be offended if we were to introduce ‘bonuses’ to increase diversity.
“It is condescending and totally disingenuous. Some of our young top performing women are tired and bored by the debate. They don’t want Prince Charming on a white horse. They want opportunity, training, career development and a fair go.”
Ms Lloyd-Hurwitz told AFR in a separate article that, “all the research tells us that diverse teams make better business decisions. We’ve got to be, as an industry, a lot more open to different points of view and inclusion. It’s not just gender, its background, education, sexual orientation, where people come from.”
What continues to present barriers to the progress of women across professional industries is pay inequality, lack of diversity in senior positions (creating a self-perpetuating status quo) and the old ‘boys club’ culture that still dominates a number of industries.
It’s all about the customer
Coming back to the heart of the discussion as far as business goes, Ms Chen emphasised again and again in her Women World Changers Summit: “It comes back to KYC: Know Your Customer.”
No matter where you are or what you are offering, your customers are not just one gender or one ethnicity – if, in fact, they ever were.
If you cater to a mostly European and mostly male demographic, because that’s the composition of your top brains trust, you are set to lose out.
Superdiversity is likely to become less ‘super’ and more the norm.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.