Does a new ASIC funding model hurt brokers?
A new ASIC funding proposal targeting stockbrokers has come under fire from the Stockbrokers Association of Australia (SAA).
The SAA has labelled the proposal a tax, saying it will jeopardise the financial position of several practices and lead to job losses.
The Stockbrokers Association of Australia has issued its own submission with regards to the Government’s proposed ASIC funding model, warning that some broking firms will be slugged with an increase in supervisory costs of up to 400 per cent which they will be unable to pass on to investors.
They claim that this will result in a disproportionate impact on smaller broking firms, who are already under significant compliance and industry cost burdens.
“The broking industry already contributes around $16 million to ASIC supervision through the Market Supervision Cost Recovery levy,” said Andrew Green, CEO of the Stockbrokers Association of Australia.
“Brokers are also subject to other cost recovery regimes, including AUSTRAC cost recovery and Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) annual fees.
“The ASIC funding proposal is just another tax on the industry which could lead to firms closing operations in Australia and moving offshore to lower cost jurisdictions.
“This will weaken Australia’s position and compromise our ability to compete with other markets in our region,” he said.
Mr Green fears that the new proposal could also result in broking firms being hit with additional costs. These costs would come from industry sectors including market exchange operators.
The Association believes an alternative mechanism to consider is a transaction based levy.
“While a levy has a number of shortcomings, it would overcome the difficulties brokers face in passing through costs,” Mr Green said.
“A transaction levy such as that employed in Hong Kong, which is based on the dollar value of the transaction, may be preferable to a cost recovery burden that would significantly damage the broking sector.”
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (CAR No.433913) is a corporate authorised representative of Maven Capital Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 418504). The information contained in this article is general information only. Any advice is general advice only. Neither your personal objectives, financial situation nor needs have been taken into consideration. Accordingly you should consider how appropriate the advice (if any) is to those objectives, financial situation and needs, before acting on the advice.
Conflict of Interest Notice
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd does and seeks to do business with companies featured in its articles. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this article. Investors should consider this article as only a single factor in making any investment decision. The publishers of this article also wish to disclose that they may hold this stock in their portfolios and that any decision to purchase this stock should be done so after the purchaser has made their own inquires as to the validity of any information in this article.
The information contained in this article is current at the finalised date. The information contained in this article is based on sources reasonably considered to be reliable by S3 Consortium Pty Ltd, and available in the public domain. No “insider information” is ever sourced, disclosed or used by S3 Consortium.