Can Federal Budget tax breaks make everyone happy?
Published 03-APR-2019 12:10 P.M.
7 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
Federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg brought down his Federal Budget last night to mixed reactions.
The document was mostly well-received, particularly the asset write off for SMEs.
The measure initially applied only to businesses with turnovers sub-$2 million but was raised to encompass those up to $10 million in July 2016.
The write-off allows businesses to use simplified depreciation rules and claim an immediate deduction for the business portion of each asset (new or second-hand) costing less than a threshold — previously set at $20,000.
The write-off has increased to $30,000 and is available to an estimated 220,000 additional businesses.
Businesses with turnovers up to $50 million will now be able to claim the up-front deduction, taking the total to 3.4 million Australian companies.
Every industry has put its two cents in, so let's have a look at some of the commentary surrounding the budget.
Pitcher Partners’ Michael Dundas
It’s been a hugely popular and important measure for small businesses and we have seen many only invest solely on the availability of that write-off.
To see the instant write-off extended not only in duration but in the size of the business is really welcome.
As far as a stimulus measure goes, it is targeted, tried and tested. It is well understood by business and a very effective measure for business growth.
We would dearly like to see Labor throw their support behind this announcement.
We want to give businesses confidence that they can make investment decisions now, rather than wait to see the result of the election”
Scottish Pacific CEO Peter Langham
Simplifying the complex tax system and cutting red tape, and on a state basis getting rid of payroll tax, would have the biggest daily impact for Australia’s small to medium business sector. These are the everyday impact items that will energise SMEs, encourage business investment and drive growth and innovation.
SME company tax cuts being brought forward would be welcomed by the sector, given this was the top initiative SMEs wanted to see (nominated as top priority by 27% of business owners). One in five SMEs want the newly elected government to prioritise cutting red tape by reducing their administrative and regulatory burden.
Asset write-off welcome
Almost 24% said continuing the asset write-off should be the Federal Government's top focus for SMEs.
Mr Langham said they will be delighted with the Budget's flagged increase of the instant asset write-off up to $30,000 (from $25,000) and opening this initiative up to SMEs with up to $50m turnover (an increase from $10m turnover).
$2b securitisation fund for SME access to finance
This government announcement will not have much of an impact at the coalface for business owners.
Mr Langham said SME Growth Index results showed that not quite 3% of business owners believed this should be the government's SME priority.
Business Council of Australia chief executive Jennifer Westacott:
This is a strong and responsible budget that delivers a surplus, lowers personal income taxes and invests in jobs, health, education and infrastructure, Business Council chief executive Jennifer Westacott said.
This is the payoff for the community from spending discipline and hard work.
Business has continued to do the heavy-lifting in this budget – which again is proof that when business thrives, Australia thrives.
Not everyone was happy.
Rafael Moyano, Managing Director, Modis Australia -
Innovation and R&D Tax Incentive
At a time when we should be significantly investing in Australia’s innovation system, it is a little disconcerting to see that technology has taken a backseat in the government’s agenda.
Without stability and clarification on the R&D tax incentive scheme, our industry and wider economy is at risk of stagnating. Many Australian tech companies rely on the initiative to help grow their businesses. Without dedicated financial support, it impacts our nation’s ability to support emerging innovation, propel global growth and build a favourable business environment.
Ahead of the election, we need our political leaders to champion R&D in Australia by implementing effective programs to encourage the development of pioneering products and services. In a world where technology is driving unfathomable, brilliant transformation across countless sectors, it has never been more vital for the government to prioritise the tech ecosystem. This will go a long way in fostering greater benefits for the wider Australian economy.
That said, we are pleased to see the introduction of Skill Organisations. We hope that this development of training packages for high demand skills will help in fostering a more needs based approach to skills development, particularly for disadvantaged job seekers and those starting their careers. This is a welcomed announcement, ensuring that students have a wide range of employment opportunities available, regardless of their location, access to training or advantage.
Lucy Manne, Head of Policy and Campaigns at women’s rights organisation ActionAid
Ms Manne believes it continues the Australian Government’s downward spiral when it comes to the aid budget, which is critical in supporting women to rise out of poverty and to achieve gender equality:
There is a real danger that this budget is going to make the situation worse by investing in initiatives such as the Australia Infrastructure Financing Facility for the Pacific, which has excluded women from the design and could deepen inequality.
The Government should be investing in funding local, women-led solutions to challenges faced by the region such as climate change and increased humanitarian emergencies – but it has instead slashed the aid budget for the sixth year in a row.
The so-called ‘Pacific step up’ package will siphon millions from the aid budget that should be supporting women’s rights and gender equality in the region, and put it into a rushed infrastructure facility that may undermine sustainable development outcomes.
Although the Government is touting Australians and our neighbours as winners in this budget, it has not incorporated meaningful discussions with women’s groups. Instead of demonstrating a genuine commitment to protecting women’s rights, it has delivered a disappointing Budget and a half-baked strategy for the Pacific that, to date, seems focused more on funding reality TV than on gender equality.
Yet, despite some groups' concerns, it has been a mostly positive response.
In his capacity as MD of Modis Australia (along with being CEO of Adecco) Rafael Moyano says of Vocational Education and Training:
Despite creating almost one million jobs in the past five years or so, youth unemployment in Australia shows no signs of abating. We are pleased to see a $525.3 million funding boost for vocational education and training, as well as apprenticeships, as this will certainly help alleviate and address current skills shortage and create more opportunities for young people.
With Australia experiencing a skills gap across many industries, the National Skills Commission is a step in the right direction to fostering a closer connection between industry demands and skills development. The introduction of the regional Training Hubs is also a promising initiative. This will help students in Australia’s youth unemployment hot spots complete secondary education and have an equal opportunity at success regardless of their location, whilst providing access to training in industries facing skill shortages.
Ultimately, public and private sector organisations need to work more closely together to support young Australians and better prepare them for the real world. Nations that are most successful at tackling youth unemployment are known for cultivating a holistic approach to education that not only encourages experiential and project-based learning, but provide work based training opportunities like apprenticeships.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.