Next Investors logo grey

Backdoor RTO listing set to lose bang for its buck

Published 25-MAY-2016 11:42 A.M.


4 minute read

Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.

In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.

The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.

Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.

Click Here to View Latest Articles

New ASX rules expected to come into force on 1 September 2016 are expected to deliver a serious blow to the attractiveness of reverse takeovers (RTOs) on the ASX.

An RTO is a de-facto listing method allowing unlisted entities to become ASX-listed through an existing company that’s become inactive.

The ASX-listing process includes a comprehensive set of rules which all entities must abide by in order to have their listing approved by the ASX. In 2014, the ASX relaxed issuance rules and introduced new changes to the RTO process in order to help struggling companies find new buyers and inject fresh investment capital into the beleaguered mining sector. One of the key changes was the ability for companies to list with a valuation of less than 20c per share.

The changes implemented by the ASX were well received and led to an immediate spike in RTO applications.

Two years on, the ASX has announced a consultation paper into what new measures will be enforced as part of the ASX’s listing rules, expected to come into force on 1 September 2016.

Next Investors Image

Several proposals within the consultation paper suggest future RTOs will become much more complicated and will need to satisfy a greater number of conditions, thereby weighing on the popularity of RTOs.

The proposed changes include:

  1. Increasing the consolidated profit requirement under the profit test for the 12 months prior to admission to at least $500,000.
  2. Lifting the Net Tangible Assets (NTA) threshold from $3 million to $5 million.
  3. Lifting the market capitalisation threshold from $10 million to $20 million.
  4. Introducing a rules-based 20% minimum free float requirement for ASX listings at the time of admission.
  5. Changing the minimum spread requirement for ASX listings to require:
    • 200 security holders if the entity has a free float of less than $50 million, or
    • 100 security holders if the entity has a free float of $50 million or more; and
    • Each security holder counted towards spread must hold a parcel of securities with a value of at least $5,000.
  6. Standardising the current $1.5 million minimum working capital requirement by extending additional requirements that currently apply only to oil & gas companies, to all entities
  7. Introducing a new requirement for entities to produce audited accounts for the last 3 full financial years.
  8. Amending Listing Rule 1.11 to require the overseas exchange on which a foreign exempt listing is listed to be one “acceptable to ASX” and also amend the assets test for foreign exempt listings to require such entities either to have either minimum net tangible assets of $2 billion (as is currently the case) or a minimum market capitalisation of $2 billion.

All in all, the proposed changes are likely to scale back the vigour with which new companies took up the RTO route in recent years.

19 companies used the backdoor listing route in 2013, rising to 29 in 2014 and 59 in 2015. So far in 2016, 36 resource companies have been reborn as technology companies including entities such as Minquest (ASX:MNQ) and Xped (ASX:XPE). Overall, the ASX currently has 14 pending floats to be completed later this year.

Other RTO success stories in recent years include:

Velpic (ASX:VPC), a coal company that metamorphosed into a tech startup supplying corporate software;
Invigor Group (IOT), formerly a gold exploration company that’s embarked on an Internet of Things adventure, and;
MSM Corp. (ASX:MSM), better known as Megastar Millionaire, who moved from minerals exploration to an online-variant of popular TV shows such as X-Factor and American Idol.

The lure of RTO’s

The main reason RTOs have been so attractive is the perceived lower level of listing requirements compared with a traditional Initial Public Offering (IPO) listing. RTOs tend to have lower thresholds on their issue price, often come pre-loaded with existing investors and may require a smaller capital raising as part of the listing process.

For some companies, the RTO route is a far better option especially if capital expenditure is a prime concern. For others, having a shareholder register that essentially backed a completely different business in a different sector, can be a point of contention and volatile price action as old investors scramble out of their holdings at the first hint of a price increase.

The two big issues likely to be of most concern is the lifting of the minimum NTA requirement from $3 million to $5 million and the minimum market capitalisation from $10 million to $20 million. It is feared these two changes in isolation, will already undermine many companies’ efforts to list on the ASX given that RTO companies tend to be smaller and more capital conscious.

The ASX is seeking responses to its proposals by 24 June 2016 and plans to introduce the proposed changes on 1 September 2016.

General Information Only

S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.

Conflicts of Interest Notice

S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.

Publication Notice and Disclaimer

The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.

Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.